|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7673
   |
Posted - 2014.08.15 02:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Desivo Delta Visseroff wrote:God!!! Y U ALL Complaint so much. You lack discipline, dedication and creativity.
Here:
[Hawk, DualASB Hawk]
Damage Control II
Ballistic Control System II
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I
X5 Prototype Engine Enervator
Small Ancillary Shield Booster, Cap Booster 25
Small Ancillary Shield Booster, Cap Booster 25
Limited 1MN Microwarpdrive I
'Arbalest' Rocket Launcher I, Caldari Navy Scourge Rocket
'Arbalest' Rocket Launcher I, Caldari Navy Scourge Rocket
'Arbalest' Rocket Launcher I, Caldari Navy Scourge Rocket
'Arbalest' Rocket Launcher I, Caldari Navy Scourge Rocket
280mm 'Scout' Artillery I, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma S
Small Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II
Small Anti-Explosive Screen Reinforcer II
All your problems are solved!
+1.
Reading comprehension and creativity isn't a strong suit among some of our space fairing compadres lol. The DEV blog and the attached comments thread addresses almost all the issues raised here.
Your asb hawk. TWO captable remote repping FoF missile hawks. Dual Prop Faction Frig. Worm, ANY worm lol. I've already figured out a half dozen things I want to try. |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7676
|
Posted - 2014.08.15 12:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Prospector Monk wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Goldiiee wrote:Burner Missions are 100% optional. There will be no standings penalty for turning down or failing these missions. Your friendly neighborhood security agent knows that not every capsuleer will have the equipment or skills to take on these missions and wonGÇÖt be offended if you decline. LP value reduction however will be mandatory, another example of CCP ******* mission runners in the ass. They wont quit until it takes a 100m sp character 100 hours to grind a PLEX in hisec. How would LP loose its value? Nowhere is it stated lp is rewarded. Also there's a chance of faction drops which will lower the value of factionmods which is very good. This change will maybe lower the value of pirate lp stores, but prob not by that much. So farming crystals will still be profitable  Also my main has 90 mil skillpoints and makes a plex every 5 hours running lvl 5's solo. And that's not even fast.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4912365#post4912381
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're still tuning the rewards, but expect them to be a bit more LP focused then ISK focused, since there won't be tons of NPCs for us to distribute bounties onto.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7676
|
Posted - 2014.08.15 13:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Don't get me wrong, Im looking forward to these new missions. I've got my Worms ready to go lol (trying to figure out if projected ECCM will be helpful in the guristas burner, then i realized that a single npc frig probably won't jam BOTH my worms at the same time and i sue FoF missiles anyway, so ill just put a remote rep on both ships).
But I remember how incursions were supposed to be challenging. There were for exactly 4 days lol. Same with Wormholes. I have some ideas on how CCP could the potential issues , but we'll just have to wait and see how things work on SiSi.
On a side note, many PVErs are solo players (most of whom don't use isboxer and many of whom don't use alts in pve). I think this has an effect on some folks not seeing some of the exploitable potential here  |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7676
|
Posted - 2014.08.15 13:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Seven Koskanaiken wrote:The fact people are already drafting eve survival articles says these missions aren't difficult enough. I'd say they need some randomization or at least more permutations in the description of each one so at least you have to change fittings more than once against the same faction. Otherwise you might as well just code Damsel Part II. Won't matter for the go-to ships. Those would be (in order of approximate effectiveness): Worm Garmur Interceptors Probably a Malus Certain EAFs In fact, I'd have a crack at these in a merlin and have a pretty solid chance of success.
Forgot the assault frigs.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7677
|
Posted - 2014.08.15 13:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:afkalt wrote:Seven Koskanaiken wrote:The fact people are already drafting eve survival articles says these missions aren't difficult enough. I'd say they need some randomization or at least more permutations in the description of each one so at least you have to change fittings more than once against the same faction. Otherwise you might as well just code Damsel Part II. Won't matter for the go-to ships. Those would be (in order of approximate effectiveness): Worm Garmur Interceptors Probably a Malus Certain EAFs In fact, I'd have a crack at these in a merlin and have a pretty solid chance of success. What the heck is a malus?
https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Maulus
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7684
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 12:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Gaming God wrote:James Baboli wrote:Hakaari Inkuran wrote:Gaming God wrote:Why is it so hard to just give us some new normal level 4 missions ? Remove missions like duo of dead and just give us some normal level 4 missions . And please do something about the inflation increase bounties . If i wanted to fly an frig i would go to 0.0 But i dont want to fly an frig   This is not fore the mission runner NO this is fore the PVP guy that wants to train someting with out any risk to loose his pod !! Hm that name looks familiar... Can you say ALOD? Bla bla bla
I translate this as "I didn't want that 22 billion isk Golem anyway" lol.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7782
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 00:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Daniel Ornulf wrote:I thought high-end pvpers live in nullsec or at least never spend hours doing boring missions so who exactly did CCP create this content for?
People who lke a challenge. Like most of the people in this thread.
|
|
|
| |
|